Aluminum Grades For CNC Machining Cost And Selection Guide

Jul 31, 2026

Leave a message

Zuber Chen
Zuber Chen
Zuber is a senior mechanical engineer and deputy project manager with expertise in manufacturing, 3D printers, automobiles and drones. As a manufacturing content writer, he is an avid reader and likes tinkering with DIY photography in his spare time.

Selecting the optimal aluminum grades for CNC machining requires balancing yield strength, chip formation, stress relief temper, and post-processing compatibility. While Al6061-T651 serves as the industry standard for general structural parts due to its balanced machinability and cost, Al7075-T651 delivers aerospace-grade strength (503 MPa yield) at a higher raw material price but lower machining cycle time. Avoid using Al5052 for complex milled components due to extreme built-up edge (BUE) galling and high deburring costs; reserve it for sheet metal or basic turned parts. For thin-wall pockets or tight tolerances (under ±0.012 mm), always specify stress-relieved tempers (T651 or T7451) to prevent stress-relief warping.

 

Raw Material Choice vs. Total CNC Part Manufacturing Cost

In precision CNC manufacturing, raw material purchasing costs represent only 15% to 30% of the total unit price of a finished component. Machining labor, spindle time, cutting tool wear, secondary finishing yields, and scrap rates dictate the remaining 70% to 85%. Choosing an incorrect aluminum alloy grade based purely on raw ingot pricing frequently inflates total project expenditure.

 

TOTAL PART COST BREAKDOWN:

 

· Raw Material: 15% - 30%

· Machining: 40% - 55% (Driven by Machinability & Chip Control)

· Deburring & Finishing: 10% - 20% (Driven by Ductility & Galling)

· Scrap & QA: 5% - 10% (Driven by Residual Stress Warping)

 

Dazao Machinery Shop-Floor Case Study: The $18,000 Stress-Relief Scrap Event

During a 2021 production run for an ISO9001-compliant medical robotics client, Xiamen Dazao Machinery accepted a drawing for 250 units of thin-walled (1.5 mm wall thickness) electronic sensor enclosures. The customer drawing specified standard Al6061-T6 plate stock to control material costs.

 

The machining sequence involved heavy pocket milling, removing 72% of the original billet volume on a 5-axis CNC machining center. Upon releasing the hydraulic fixture clamps after the final finishing pass, internal thermal residual stresses locked into the extruded T6 plate relaxed. The parts warped, exhibiting a center bow of 1.85 mm, far exceeding the drawing flatness tolerance of ±0.05 mm.

CMM inspection measuring flatness distortion on a heavy pocketed Al6061-T6 CNC milled enclosure at Dazao Machinery facility

 

The entire batch of 250 parts was scrapped. The root cause was not tool deflection or spindle runout, but the unreleased residual stress state of the standard T6 temper. Dazao absorbed an $18,000 loss in machine time and stock. Re-running the job using stress-relieved Al6061-T651 stock-which undergoes a 1.5% to 3% permanent stretch post-quenching-yielded flat parts within ±0.02 mm total indication reading (TIR) straight off the machine.

 

The Gap Between Raw Material Price and True Part Cost

Procurement directors often compare raw aluminum stock by weight:

 

· Al5052-H32: ~$3.20 / kg

· Al6061-T6: ~$3.80 / kg

· Al7075-T6: ~$8.50 / kg

 

However, processing Al5052 on a CNC milling center requires reducing cutting speeds by 40% to manage built-up edge (BUE) formation, and adds manual deburring cycles averaging 6 minutes per part. Conversely, Al7075 cuts with clean, brittle chip formation at spindle speeds exceeding 18,000 RPM, reducing machine cycle time by 35% compared to Al6061.

 

Understanding the engineering mechanics of different aluminum grades for CNC machining enables engineering and procurement teams to minimize Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) without compromising mechanical integrity. For a detailed breakdown of shop-floor setup protocols, refer to our comprehensive aluminum CNC machining guide.

 

Three Critical CNC Machining Blind Spots Ignored by Material Handbooks

Most commercial material guides list basic tensile strength and elongation metrics from supplier datasheets. They fail to address real-world machining phenomena encountered on the shop floor.

 

Blind Spot 1: The T6 vs T651 Temper Trap (Residual Thermal Stress Distortion)

Standard material callouts specify Al6061-T6 or Al7075-T6. The T6 designation indicates solution heat treatment followed by artificial aging. During the rapid water quench phase of heat treatment, the outer envelope of the aluminum plate cools rapidly while the core stays hot. This thermal differential locks severe asymmetric residual tension and compression stress tensors into the stock.

 

When a CNC end mill cuts into a T6 plate and removes material unevenly, the internal stress equilibrium is destroyed. The remaining material springs back to relieve the internal force, causing immediate bowing, twisting, or cupping.

 

T6 TEMPER (UNSTRETCHED):

· Outer Layer: High Internal Tension Stress

· Core Layer: High Compressive Stress

· Result: Heavy pocket milling unbalances internal stresses, causing parts to warp upon fixture release.

 

T651 TEMPER (STRETCHED 1.5% - 3%):

· Outer & Core Layers: Neutralized Stress Fields

· Result: Mechanical stretching redistributes stress, maintaining dimensional stability for tight tolerances down to ±0.01 mm.

 

The T651 temper designation (such as Al6061-T651 or Al7075-T651) indicates that after solution heat treating, the mill mechanically stretches the material by 1.5% to 3% along its longitudinal axis. This plastic deformation redistributes and neutralizes internal residual stress fields.

 

· Engineering Rule: For any CNC milled component where material removal exceeds 40% of the raw billet volume, or where wall thickness drops below 2.0 mm, specifying T651 (or T7451 for 7000-series) is mandatory to guarantee dimensional stability down to ±0.01 mm.

 

Blind Spot 2: The 5052 Galling Trap and Hidden Deburring Labor Expenses

Material guides frequently market Al5052 as an economical, highly corrosion-resistant option. While true for sheet metal shearing and press-brake bending, 5052 aluminum cnc machining presents significant processing challenges.

 

Because Al5052 lacks major strengthening elements like silicon or copper, it exhibits high ductility and low shear resistance. During CNC milling:

 

1. The soft aluminum adheres to the carbide cutting edge, forming a Built-Up Edge (BUE).

2. BUE changes the effective rake angle of the tool, causing torn surface finishes (Ra > 3.2 µm) and accelerated micro-chipping of the tool edge.

3. Instead of shearing off cleanly, material deforms plastically along the tool exit path, producing heavy, ductile flash burrs.

 

TOOL / MATERIAL INTERACTION AT CUTTING EDGE:

· Brittle Alloy (e.g., Al7075): High shear stress leads to clean, short, broken chips with zero BUE.

· Ductile Alloy (e.g., Al5052): Material adhesion causes Built-Up Edge (BUE), leading to heavy burrs and surface tearing.

 

Manual bench deburring of complex Al5052 geometry can require 5 to 15 minutes per part, quickly outpacing any initial raw material savings.

 

Blind Spot 3: Anodizing Color Discrepancies in Mixed-Alloy Mechanical Assemblies

When designing multi-part assemblies-such as a robotic end-effector comprising a 6061 mounting plate and a 7075 structural arm-engineers often specify a single finishing callout: Type II Black Anodize per MIL-A-8625.

 

When these parts are processed in the same anodizing tank bath, they emerge with distinct visual shade variations:

 

· Al6061 contains 0.4%–0.8% Silicon and 0.8%–1.2% Magnesium. It forms a uniform, clear aluminum oxide layer (Al2O3) that absorbs black organic dye evenly, producing a deep, jet-black satin finish.

 

· Al7075 contains 5.1%–6.1% Zinc and 2.1%–2.9% Copper. During the sulfuric acid anodizing pre-etch phase, copper and zinc intermetallic phases dissolve at different rates, altering light refraction across the anodic coat. The resulting finish on 7075 often appears dark grey or brownish-black with variable reflectivity.

 

ANODIZING DYE ABSORPTION DIFFERENTIAL:

· Al6061 (0.6% Si, 1.0% Mg): Anodic oxide layer creates uniform pore diameters, resulting in a pure jet-black finish.

· Al7075 (5.6% Zn, 1.6% Cu): Anodic oxide layer forms irregular pore structures, resulting in a dark grey or brownish tint.

 

If visual uniformity across mating components is a hard requirement, avoid mixing 6000-series and 7000-series alloys in the same visible assembly, or utilize non-etching pre-treatment chemical baths specified in coordination with your finishing partner.

 

Technical Analysis of Primary CNC Machining Aluminum Alloys

Choosing the best aluminum for cnc machining requires evaluating chemical compositions, physical mechanical properties, cutting parameters, and finishing characteristics.

High grade aluminum billet stock inventory including 6061-T651 and 7075-T651 at Xiamen Dazao Machinery factory

 

Alloy 6061-T651: Metallurgical Profile and Machinability

Al6061 (precipitation hardened with Magnesium and Silicon) represents roughly 70% of all precision CNC aluminum components manufactured worldwide.

 

Al6061-T651 TYPICAL CHEMICAL COMPOSITION (% BY WEIGHT):

· Silicon (Si): 0.4 - 0.8

· Iron (Fe): 0.7 max

· Copper (Cu): 0.15 - 0.4

· Manganese (Mn): 0.15 max

· Magnesium (Mg): 0.8 - 1.2

· Chromium (Cr): 0.04 - 0.35

· Zinc (Zn): 0.25 max

 

Metallurgical Phase Strengthening

The high strength of Al6061-T651 is achieved through precipitation hardening. Solution heat treatment at 530°C dissolves alloying elements into a solid solution. Rapid water quenching retains this structure at room temperature. Artificial aging at 160°C for 18 hours causes fine needle-like β′′ phase precipitates (Mg2Si) to form throughout the matrix. These microscopic precipitates pin dislocations, increasing yield strength from 55 MPa (annealed O temper) to 276 MPa in the T651 temper.

 

Grain Structure Anisotropy (L vs. LT vs. ST Directions)

Extruded bar stock and rolled plate exhibit directional mechanical grain orientation:

 

· Longitudinal (L): Direction of rolling/extrusion (Highest tensile strength: 310 MPa).

· Long Transverse (LT): Across the width of the plate (Slightly reduced elongation).

· Short Transverse (ST): Through the thickness of the plate (Prone to delamination under high transverse loads).

When designing heavy-load structural brackets, align primary bending stresses parallel to the L rolling grain direction.

 

Machinability Profile (6061 aluminum machinability)

6061 exhibits a machinability rating of 50% relative to free-cutting 2011 aluminum. It yields predictable, curled chips when cut with high-rake, polished carbide tooling. Achieving consistent surface finish standards down to Ra 0.8 µm is readily achievable in standard 3-axis and 5-axis milling operations without secondary grinding.

 

Complete Cutting Parameter Matrix for Al6061-T651:

Operation

Cutting Speed

VcVc

(m/min)

Feed per Tooth

fzfz

(mm/tooth)

Axial Depth

apap

(mm)

Radial Depth

aeae

(mm)

Recommended Tooling / Coating

Face Milling

800 – 1500

0.10 – 0.25

1.5 – 3.0

70% Cutter Dia.

45° Indexable Face Mill, Uncoated Carbide Inserts

Rough Slotting

500 – 900

0.05 – 0.12

1.0×Dia.

100% Cutter Dia.

3-Flute Carbide End Mill, ZrN or DLC Coated

High-Speed Pocketing

1000 – 2200

0.08 – 0.18

1.5×Dia.

10% – 20% Cutter Dia.

3-Flute High-Helix (45°), Polished Flutes

Finishing Milling

1200 – 2500

0.03 – 0.08

0.2 – 0.5

5% – 10% Cutter Dia.

3-Flute or PCD End Mill, Ra 0.4 µm finish

Drilling

150 – 300

0.12 – 0.25 mm/rev

3.0×Dia.

N/A

135° Split Point Carbide Drill, Internal Coolant

Tapping (Forming)

20 – 40

Pitch Dependent

N/A

N/A

HSS-E or Carbide Roll Form Tap (No Chips)

 

Optimal Tool Geometry & Speeds

· Surface Speed (Vc): 600 – 1200 m/min (2000 – 4000 SFM)

· Feed Per Tooth (fz): 0.05 – 0.20 mm/tooth (0.002 – 0.008 in/tooth)

· Recommended Tool Geometry: 3-flute end mills with a 37° to 45° helix angle, polished flutes, and a cylindrical margin to eliminate chatter during high-speed finishing passes.

 

Ideal Applications

Automotive brackets, structural robot arms, sensor housings, industrial machinery bases, and general prototype components requiring a balance of strength, weldability, and corrosion resistance.

 

Alloy 7075-T651: Aerospace Mechanical Properties and High-Speed Machining

When structural strength-to-weight ratio is the primary design metric, Al7075 is the industry standard. Alloying with zinc (5.1%–6.1%) and magnesium yields a micro-structure capable of matching the tensile strength of structural steel.

 

Al7075-T651 TYPICAL CHEMICAL COMPOSITION (% BY WEIGHT):

· Zinc (Zn): 5.1 - 6.1

· Magnesium (Mg): 2.1 - 2.9

· Copper (Cu): 1.2 - 2.0

· Iron (Fe): 0.5 max

· Silicon (Si): 0.4 max

· Manganese (Mn): 0.3 max

· Chromium (Cr): 0.18 - 0.28

· Titanium (Ti): 0.2 max

 

MECHANICAL PROPERTY COMPARISON:

· Al6061-T651: Tensile Yield Strength 276 MPa | Brinell Hardness 95 HB

· Al7075-T651: Tensile Yield Strength 503 MPa | Brinell Hardness 150 HB

· Structural Steel (A36): Tensile Yield Strength 250 MPa | Brinell Hardness 119 HB

 

Precipitate Hardening Mechanisms (ηPhase MgZn2)

In Al7075, strength is driven by coherent and semi-coherent metastable η′ precipitates (MgZn2) formed during artificial aging at 120°C for 24 hours. These dense precipitates resist dislocation movement under high mechanical stress, granting 7075-T651 an ultimate tensile strength of 570 MPa and an endurance limit of 160 MPa (500 million reversed stress cycles).

 

Machinability Profile (7075 aluminum machining)

Despite its high hardness (150 HB), Al7075 cuts exceptionally well. Its high yield strength causes chips to fracture quickly, generating short, easily evacuated segment chips rather than long continuous ribbons.

 

This clean chip formation allows machine operators to run aggressive axial depths of cut (ap) and high table feeds. However, the higher material shear stress increases cutting forces by roughly 30% to 40% compared to 6061, accelerating tool flank wear if spindle power or tool rigidity is insufficient.

 

Complete Cutting Parameter Matrix for Al7075-T651:

Operation

Cutting Speed

VcVc

(m/min)

Feed per Tooth

fzfz

(mm/tooth)

Axial Depth

apap

(mm)

Radial Depth

aeae

(mm)

Recommended Tooling / Coating

Face Milling

600 – 1200

0.08 – 0.20

1.0 – 2.5

65% Cutter Dia.

Indexable, TiB2 or DLC Coated Carbide Inserts

Rough Pocketing

400 – 800

0.04 – 0.10

1.0 × Dia.

100% Cutter Dia.

3-Flute Carbide End Mill, DLC or TiB2 Coated

High-Efficiency Milling (HEM)

800 – 1800

0.06 – 0.15

2.0 ×Dia.

8% – 15% Cutter Dia.

3-Flute Variable Pitch End Mill, High-Rigidity

Finishing Milling

1000 – 2000

0.02 – 0.06

0.1 – 0.3

3% – 8% Cutter Dia.

Single-Crystal Diamond or Polished Carbide

Drilling

120 – 220

0.08 – 0.18 mm/rev

3.0 × Dia.

N/A

Solid Carbide Drill, 30° Helix, 70 Bar Coolant

Tapping (Cutting)

12 – 25

Pitch Dependent

N/A

N/A

Spiral Flute HSS-Co or Carbide Cut Tap

 

The Economics: When 7075 Reduces Total Cost (6061 vs 7075 aluminum)

Consider a heavy pocketing application machining a 10 kg billet down to a 1.2 kg aerospace manifold:

 

ECONOMIC TRADEOFF ANALYSIS (6061 vs 7075):

· Raw Material Cost: Al6061-T651 = $38.00 | Al7075-T651 = $85.00

· Roughing Cycle Time: Al6061-T651 = 28 Mins | Al7075-T651 = 16 Mins

· Finishing Cycle Time: Al6061-T651 = 12 Mins | Al7075-T651 = 8 Mins

· Total Machine Time: Al6061-T651 = 40 Mins | Al7075-T651 = 24 Mins

· Machining Cost (@ $90/hr): Al6061-T651 = $60.00 | Al7075-T651 = $36.00

· TOTAL PART COST: Al6061-T651 = $98.00 | Al7075-T651 = $121.00

 

While Al7075 increased raw material expense by 47.00,it saved 16 minutes of machine time(24.00 savings). On high-rate 5-axis machines with higher hourly shop rates ($150+/hr), the cycle-time savings of 7075 can fully offset its raw material premium.

 

Overaging Treatments: T7351 vs. T7651 Tempers

Standard 7075-T651 is susceptible to Stress Corrosion Cracking (SCC) when exposed to marine environments under sustained tensile loads. To mitigate SCC, aerospace drawings often specify two-stage overaging tempers:

 

· T7351 Temper: Overaged at 160°C to 180°C. Reduces tensile yield strength by ~13% (to 435 MPa), but increases SCC resistance to immune levels.

· T7651 Temper: Intermediate overaging. Balances high strength (460 MPa) with exfoliation corrosion resistance.

 

Alloy 5052-H32: Machining Boundaries and Galling Mitigation

Al5052 belongs to the 5000-series (Al-Mg) family. It derives its strength from solid-solution hardening and cold working (H32 or H34 tempers), making it non-heat-treatable via thermal precipitation aging.

 

Al5052-H32 TYPICAL CHEMICAL COMPOSITION (% BY WEIGHT):

· Magnesium (Mg): 2.2 - 2.8

· Chromium (Cr): 0.15 - 0.35

· Iron (Fe): 0.4 max

· Silicon (Si): 0.25 max

· Copper (Cu): 0.1 max

· Manganese (Mn): 0.1 max

· Zinc (Zn): 0.1 max

 

Machinability Profile (5052 aluminum cnc machining)

Al5052 has a lower machinability rating (35%). Its high ductility (12% to 20% elongation at break) causes material to smear across the cutter rather than shear cleanly.

Microscopic view of built-up edge BUE on tool flute caused by machining soft 5052 aluminum alloy

 

Complete Cutting Parameter Matrix for Al5052-H32:

Operation

Cutting Speed

VcVc

(m/min)

Feed per Tooth

fzfz

(mm/tooth)

Axial Depth

apap

(mm)

Radial Depth

aeae

(mm)

Recommended Tooling / Coating

Face Milling

400 – 700

0.08 – 0.15

0.8 – 1.5

50% Cutter Dia.

High-Rake Inserts, Mirror Polished, DLC Coated

Milling / Slotting

250 – 500

0.03 – 0.08

0.5 ×Dia.

100% Cutter Dia.

1-Flute or 2-Flute Router/End Mill, DLC/ZrN

Finishing Milling

500 – 900

0.02 – 0.05

0.1 – 0.25

5% Cutter Dia.

2-Flute Uncoated Carbide, High-Pressure Coolant

Drilling

80 – 160

0.05 – 0.12 mm/rev

2.0 ×Dia.

N/A

Parabolic Flute Drill, Polished Flutes, High Flow

Tapping (Forming)

15 – 30

Pitch Dependent

N/A

N/A

Chrome-Plated Form Tap, Pure Neat Oil Coolant

 

Shop-Floor Tooling & Coolant Mitigation Tactics

To successfully machine Al5052 without edge buildup or thread tearing:

 

1. Tooling Selection: Use single-flute or 2-flute carbide routers/end mills with diamond-like carbon (DLC) or Zirconium Nitride (ZrN) coatings to reduce the coefficient of friction (<0.1).

 

2. Rake Angles: Specify high radial rake angles (>15°) and sharp cutting edges. Avoid tools with honing land or edge radius preparations.

 

3. High-Pressure Coolant: Deliver water-soluble coolant emulsion directly to the cutting zone at pressures exceeding 50 bar (725 psi) to mechanically blast sticky chips out of the flute gullet.

 

Application Limits

Reserve 5052 for marine equipment enclosures, liquid storage tanks, and simple turned fittings where extreme salt-water corrosion resistance outweighs high-volume machining efficiency.

 

Alloy 2024-T3: Fatigue Strength and Corrosion Limitations

Al2024 is an Al-Cu-Mg alloy recognized for its fracture toughness and cyclic fatigue strength under high tension loads.

 

Al2024-T3 TYPICAL CHEMICAL COMPOSITION (% BY WEIGHT):

· Copper (Cu): 3.8 - 4.9

· Magnesium (Mg): 1.2 - 1.8

· Manganese (Mn): 0.3 - 0.9

· Iron (Fe): 0.5 max

· Silicon (Si): 0.5 max

· Zinc (Zn): 0.25 max

· Chromium (Cr): 0.1 max

 

Machinability Profile (2024 aluminum machining)

2024 machines with short, brittle chip formation due to its copper content (3.8%–4.9%), yielding a high surface finish (Ra 0.4 µm). It exhibits a machinability rating of 70%.

 

PROPERTY MATRIX (2024-T3):

· Tensile Yield Strength: 345 MPa

· Fatigue Limit: 138 MPa (500 million cycles)

· Weldability: POOR / NOT RECOMMENDED (Hot cracking)

· Corrosion Resistance: POOR (Requires cladding / anodizing)

 

Atmospheric Corrosion Vulnerability

Unlike 6061, Al2024 exhibits poor resistance to atmospheric and galvanic corrosion. Copper-rich intermetallic particles create local micro-galvanic cells that cause severe pitting when exposed to moisture.

 

· Design Requirement: All CNC-machined 2024 components must receive protective surface treatments-typically chromic acid anodizing (Type I), hard sulfuric anodizing (Type III) with a dichromate seal, or a zinc chromate primer coat-immediately following machining. 2024 cannot be fusion welded; structural joints must rely on mechanical fasteners or structural adhesives.

 

Specialty Alloys: 6082-T6, 7050-T7451, 2011-T3, and 6063-T6

 

SPECIALTY ALLOY EXTENSIONS:

· Alloy 6082-T6: European equivalent to 6061. Higher Manganese (0.4-1.0%) improves grain structure control and fatigue limits.

· Alloy 7050-T7451: Replaces 7075 for thick plates (>80mm). Eliminates quench sensitivity and stress corrosion cracking (SCC) risk.

 

6082-T6 (European Structural Standard)

Widely specified across European automotive and industrial machinery drawings (DIN EN 755), Al6082 contains higher manganese levels (0.4%–1.0%) than 6061. This refined grain structure increases tensile strength to 310 MPa (vs 276 MPa for 6061) and improves chip-breaking performance on high-speed CNC lathes.

 

7050-T7451 (Thick Section Aerospace Plate)

When machining large structural components from thick billets (>80 mm), 7075-T6 suffers from quench sensitivity: the core of a thick 7075 plate cools slowly, reducing its internal strength relative to the surface. Al7050 substitutes zirconium for chromium, providing uniform through-thickness mechanical properties and resistance to Stress Corrosion Cracking (SCC) in the T7451 temper.

 

2011-T3 (Free-Machining Aluminum)

Known as the free-machining alloy benchmark (100% machinability rating), Al2011 contains bismuth and lead (or eco-friendly bismuth-tin additions) to break chips into tiny granules. It is used on high-volume Swiss-type CNC lathes for electrical connectors, fluid valves, and precision fasteners.

 

Limitation: Low corrosion resistance and poor anodizing dye absorption.

 

6063-T6 (Extrusion & Architectural Alloy)

Al6063 features excellent extrudability, making it ideal for thin-walled hollow enclosures and heat sinks with complex cooling fins.

 

· CNC Machining Note: It is slightly softer (73 HB) than 6061 (95 HB). During high-speed end milling, adjust feeds and speeds down by 15% to prevent edge smearing in deep heat sink channels.

 

Aluminum Alloys Performance Comparison Chart and Selection Matrix

This aluminum alloy comparison chart summarizes mechanical metrics, processing behavior, and material cost factors across common grades.

 

Comprehensive Aluminum Alloy Comparison Chart

Alloy & Temper

Yield Strength (MPa)

Tensile Strength (MPa)

Hardness (Brinell HB)

Machinability Rating (%)

Corrosion Resistance

Weldability

Anodizing Quality

Relative Material Cost Ratio

Al1100-O

35

90

23

20%

Excellent

Excellent

Excellent

0.7x

Al2011-T3

290

380

95

100% (Baseline)

Poor

Poor

Poor

1.8x

Al2024-T3

345

485

120

70%

Poor

Not Rec.

Fair

2.1x

Al5052-H32

193

230

60

35%

Excellent

Excellent

Good

0.9x

Al6061-T651

276

310

95

50%

Excellent

Excellent

Excellent

1.0x (Baseline)

Al6063-T6

214

241

73

45%

Excellent

Excellent

Superior

1.05x

Al6082-T6

260

310

95

50%

Excellent

Excellent

Excellent

1.1x

Al7050-T7451

455

510

140

70%

Good

Not Rec.

Fair

2.4x

Al7075-T651

503

570

150

70%

Fair

Poor

Good

2.2x

Al7075-T7351

435

505

135

70%

Good

Poor

Good

2.5x

CMM and manual dimensional inspection of CNC machined 7075 aluminum aerospace bracket at Xiamen Dazao Machinery

 

Material Specification Cross-Reference Guide (ASTM, EN, JIS, GB)

When sourcing custom CNC components globally, engineering drawings often reference region-specific material standards (ASTM, EN, JIS, GB). Use this cross-reference chart to verify compliance:

Material Type

United States (ASTM / SAE)

European Union (EN / DIN)

Japan (JIS)

China (GB/T)

International (ISO)

Universal Workhorse

Al6061 / UNS A96061

EN AW-6061 / AlMg1SiCu

JIS A6061

GB 6061 / LD30

ISO AlMg1SiCu

European Equivalent

Al6082 / UNS A96082

EN AW-6082 / AlSi1GiMn

JIS A6082

GB 6082

ISO AlSi1MgMn

Aerospace Ultra-High

Al7075 / UNS A97075

EN AW-7075 / AlZn5.5MgCu

JIS A7075

GB 7075 / LC4

ISO AlZn5,5MgCu

Thick Plate Aerospace

Al7050 / UNS A97050

EN AW-7050 / AlZn6CuMgZr

JIS A7050

GB 7050

ISO AlZn6CuMgZr

Sheet & Marine Enclosure

Al5052 / UNS A95052

EN AW-5052 / AlMg2.5

JIS A5052

GB 5052 / LF21

ISO AlMg2,5

Fatigue Aircraft Grade

Al2024 / UNS A92024

EN AW-2024 / AlCu4Mg1

JIS A2024

GB 2024 / LY12

ISO AlCu4Mg1

Free-Machining Screw

Al2011 / UNS A92011

EN AW-2011 / AlCu6BiPb

JIS A2011

GB 2011

ISO AlCu6BiPb

Architectural / Enclosure

Al6063 / UNS A96063

EN AW-6063 / AlMg0.7Si

JIS A6063

GB 6063 / LD31

ISO AlMg0,7Si

 

DFM Design Guidelines for Machined Aluminum Parts

To reduce machine cycle time, minimize tool deflection, and prevent chatter across all aluminum grades for cnc machining, apply these Design for Manufacturability (DFM) metrics during CAD development:

 

DFM POCKET AND WALL GEOMETRY DESIGN METRICS:

 

· Internal Corner Radius: Design Radius R = 1.15 x Tool Radius (Avoid sharp 90° corners R=0).

· Pocket Depth Ratio: Limit Pocket Depth H <= 4 x Tool Diameter (Avoid deep pockets H > 8xD).

· Floor-to-Wall Radius: Specify Floor Radius R >= 1.0 mm to reduce stress concentrations.

 

1. Internal Pocket Corner Radii (R): Never specify sharp 90° vertical internal corners (R=0). Always specify an internal corner radius that is 15% to 20% larger than standard end mill radiuses. For example, if a pocket is cut using a 10 mm diameter cutter (R=5.0 mm), design the internal corner radius as R≥5.75 mm. This allows the tool path to arc through the corner continuously without stopping, preventing cutter dwell, vibration chatter, and localized tool breakage.

 

2. Depth-to-Diameter Ratios for Pockets: Limit pocket depths to ≤4×D (where D is tool diameter). Pocketing deeper than 4×D requires long-reach end mills subject to exponential radial deflection (δ∝L3), forcing operators to reduce feeds and speeds by 60% to maintain surface finish.

 

3. Minimum Wall Thickness Guidelines:

· Unsupported Vertical Walls: Minimum 1.2 mm (for 6061-T651) and 0.8 mm (for 7075-T651).

· Supported Pocket Ribs: Minimum 1.0 mm.

· Note: If walls must be machined below 1.0 mm thickness, specify high-speed light finishing passes (HEM) or dynamic toolpaths to manage cutting pressure.

 

4. Tapping vs. Thread Forming Hole Design:

· For ductile alloys (Al6061, Al6063, Al5052), utilize Thread Roll Forming Taps instead of cutting taps. Form taps displace metal plastically without producing chips, increasing thread shear strength by ~20% and extending tap life up to 500%.

· For hard alloys (Al7075, Al2024), utilize Spiral Flute Cutting Taps or CNC Thread Mills to shear high-strength material cleanly.

 

Scenario-Based Alloy Selection Decision Framework

To answer which aluminum alloy is best for cnc machining for your project, select your primary engineering requirement:

 

SCENARIO-BASED SELECTION DECISION LOGIC:

 

1. Structural / Balanced Cost:

· If wall thickness < 2.0 mm: Select Al6061-T651 (Prevents stress-relief warping).

· If wall thickness >= 2.0 mm: Select Al6061-T6 (Standard structural choice).

 

2. High Strength / Lightweight:

· If section depth > 80 mm: Select Al7050-T7451 (Eliminates quench sensitivity in thick plate).

· If section depth <= 80 mm: Select Al7075-T651 (High load structural choice).

 

3. Corrosion Resistance / Enclosures:

· If heavy CNC milling is required: Select Al6061-T651 with anodize (Avoids 5052 galling).

· If sheet metal bending dominates: Select Al5052-H32 (Ideal for press-brake forming).

 

Procurement Quality Assurance and Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)

Ensuring material compliance and avoiding unexpected failure requires strict quality control measures before material reaches the machine bed.

 

DAZAO QUALITY ASSURANCE FLOW (IATF16949 / ISO9001):

· Step 1: Incoming Mill Certificate Verification (EN 10204 3.1)

· Step 2: Positive Material Identification (XRF Spectrometry)

· Step 3: Stress-Relief Temper Verification (T651 Stretch Mark Inspection)

· Step 4: Ultrasonic Internal Flaw Detection for Thick Plate (>50mm)

 

Mill Test Certificate (MTC) Audit Protocol

Never accept raw material deliveries without an EN 10204 3.1 MTC that documents heat batch numbers, chemical composition, and physical mechanical test results.

 

· Stress-Relief Check: Verify that the temper code reads explicitly as T651, T7451, or T7351. Standard mill certificates for stretched plate must report the permanent strain stretching value (nominally 1.5%–3.0%).

 

· XRF Spectrometry Screening: Xiamen Dazao Machinery uses handheld X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) analyzers to scan incoming raw billets, confirming alloy chemistry prior to cutting. This prevents mixing up 6061 and 7075 stock in inventory.

 

SPECTROMETER (XRF) CHEMICAL VERIFICATION MATRIX:

· Al6061: Primary markers Mg (0.8-1.2%) & Si (0.6%) | Reject threshold: Zn > 0.25%

· Al7075: Primary markers Zn (5.1-6.1%) & Cu (1.6%) | Reject threshold: Zn < 5.0%

· Al5052: Primary marker Mg (2.2-2.8%) | Reject threshold: Si > 0.3% or Cu > 0.1%

 

Surface Finishing Specifications and Anodizing Audits

If an assembly combines 6000-series and 7000-series components, ensure your manufacturing facility or finishing vendor manages chemical pretreatment accordingly:

 

· De-smutting Protocol: 7075 alloys require a non-etching alkaline cleaner followed by an nitric acid de-smutting bath to neutralize copper and zinc surface deposits before anodizing.

 

· Racking Setup: Never mount 6061 and 7075 components on the same titanium anodizing rack frame, as differential electrical conductivity will cause non-uniform current density and uneven film thickness.

 

Surface Finishing Specification Matrix

Anodizing / Coating Class

Specification Standard

Typical Film Thickness

Applicable Alloys

Engineering Purpose

Type II Anodize (Clear/Color)

MIL-A-8625 Type II, Class 1/2

8 – 25 µm

6061, 6063, 6082

Decorative finish, mild wear & corrosion resistance

Type III Hardcoat Anodize

MIL-A-8625 Type III

25 – 50 µm

6061, 7075, 7050

High wear resistance (60-70 HRC equivalent surface)

Chromate Conversion (Alodine)

MIL-DTL-5541 Type II Class 1A/3

< 1 µm

All Alloys

Electrical conductivity, paint adhesion, corrosion base

Electroless Nickel Plating

ASTM B733

10 – 30 µm

6061, 7075, 2024

Extreme chemical & wear resistance, uniform coverage

 

Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Calculation Formula

To compare quotes from manufacturing vendors accurately, procurement managers can evaluate total part costs using this formula:

 

Total Cost=Cmat+(Tcycle×Rmach)+(Tdeburr×Rlabor)+(Cscrap/(1−Pyield))

 

Where:

 

· Cmat= Raw stock purchase cost (Weight ×$/kg)

· Tcycle = Total roughing + finishing CNC spindle time (Hours)

· Rmach = Fully burdened CNC machine hourly shop rate ($/Hour)

· Tdeburr = Manual/automated deburring time (Hours)

· Rlabor = Bench technician hourly rate ($/Hour)

· Pyield = First-pass yield percentage (e.g., 0.98 for 98% yield)

 

Factoring in cycle time reductions and reduced scrap rates shows that higher-grade, stress-relieved materials like Al6061-T651 or Al7075-T651 often lower final unit costs.

 

Conclusion and Dazao Machinery Precision Manufacturing Capabilities

Successful CNC component manufacturing depends on understanding the relationship between material metallurgy, machine shop parameters, and stress-relief tempers. Selecting the correct aluminum alloy reduces cycle times, prevents dimensional warping, and optimizes total project expenditure.

 

Founded in 2000, Xiamen Dazao Machinery operates an ISO9001:2015 and IATF16949:2016 certified production facility equipped with high-speed 3-axis, 4-axis, and 5-axis CNC machining centers. Dazao provides Design for Manufacturability (DFM) support, raw material spectrographic verification, and precision machining down to ±0.005 mm tolerances for automotive, robotics, medical, and aerospace applications worldwide. Explore our comprehensive aluminum CNC machining guide to evaluate complete shop-floor capabilities and material sourcing protocols.

upload your CAD file for an instant quote

 

FAQs

 

 

01.Why does thin-wall Al6061-T6 warp into a banana shape during CNC milling?

Standard T6 plate retains unreleased thermal stresses from rapid water quenching during heat treatment. Asymmetric pocketing destroys internal stress equilibrium, causing stress relaxation warping. Specifying mechanically stretched T651 stock neutralizes internal stress tensors and guarantees flatness down to ±0.01 mm.

02.Is Al7075 cheaper to CNC machine than Al6061 overall despite material price?

Yes, in heavy machining applications. Al7075 fractures chips cleanly into small segments, allowing spindle speeds over 18,000 RPM and reducing roughing cycle time by up to 35%. On high-rate 5-axis machines, cycle time cost savings frequently surpass the raw material price difference.

03.How do machinist teams mitigate tool galling and Built-Up Edge (BUE) on Al5052?

Because 5052 lacks silicon or copper strengthening elements, it smears onto carbide flutes. Machinists mitigate BUE by utilizing DLC or ZrN polished single-flute end mills, high radial rake angles (>15°), and delivering flood coolant at pressures over 50 bar (725 psi).

04.Why do Al6061 and Al7075 components show color mismatch after black anodizing?

Al7075 contains 5.1%–6.1% zinc and 1.2%–2.0% copper, while Al6061 contains silicon and magnesium. During nitric acid pre-etching, zinc and copper dissolve at different rates, altering light reflectivity and pore structures. This causes 7075 to appear dark grey or brownish compared to jet-black 6061.

05.Should I specify thread forming taps or thread cutting taps for aluminum parts?

Use roll forming taps for ductile alloys (6061, 6063, 5052) to cold-form threads without chips, increasing thread strength by 20%. Use spiral flute cutting taps or thread mills for hard, high-strength alloys (7075, 2024) to shear metal cleanly without excessive torque breakage.

06.Why is Al2024 non-weldable and vulnerable to marine corrosion?

Al2024 contains 3.8%–4.9% copper, which causes hot-cracking during fusion welding and creates micro-galvanic corrosion cells when exposed to moisture. All 2024 components must be mechanically fastened and protected with Type I/III anodizing or chromate conversion coatings immediately after machining.
Send Inquiry